<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hash Generator - MD5, MD4, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomtools.net/hash-generator-md5-md4-sha-1-sha-256-sha-384-sha-512-and-more-5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomtools.net/hash-generator-md5-md4-sha-1-sha-256-sha-384-sha-512-and-more-5.html</link>
	<description>Advice and tools from a young web developer</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.randomtools.net/hash-generator-md5-md4-sha-1-sha-256-sha-384-sha-512-and-more-5.html#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomtools.net/?p=5#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment.  What approach would you recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.  What approach would you recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myspace Code</title>
		<link>http://www.randomtools.net/hash-generator-md5-md4-sha-1-sha-256-sha-384-sha-512-and-more-5.html#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Myspace Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomtools.net/?p=5#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading the Hash Generator - MD5, MD4, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and more post, although I did not think it was entirely the best approach ... there are alternatives which would provide more positive results ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading the Hash Generator - MD5, MD4, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and more post, although I did not think it was entirely the best approach &#8230; there are alternatives which would provide more positive results ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
